Reviews of Malacca Securities Sdn Bhd

This is page 17 of 31 of the reviews SmartChecker holds for Malacca Securities Sdn Bhd. What the public registers say about the company is set out on its record page, not here.

What does SmartChecker make of Malacca Securities?SmartChecker 怎么看 Malacca Securities?Apa pandangan SmartChecker tentang Malacca Securities?

Written by Pang Hui JuanDirector of Online Broker Research

Fact-checked by Ng Kok HeiManaging Malaysian Partner

Fact-checked

I’ve been looking into Malacca Securities, one of Malaysia’s established stockbroking firms.

Its established position in the local stockbroking industry is a strength. It is a Participating Organisation of Bursa Malaysia and provides access to Malaysian equities, online trading and Shariah-compliant stockbroking through Bursa Malaysia-i.

Read the full reviewShow less

Investors should also understand its regulatory history. In September 2022, the Securities Commission Malaysia (SC) took administrative action against Malacca Securities Sdn Bhd for two breaches of its Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing (AML/CFT) Guidelines. The issues included inadequate ongoing customer due diligence and account monitoring, and failures involving risk reclassification and suspicious transaction reporting. The SC issued a reprimand for each breach and a total penalty of RM220,000. Its review application was dismissed in February 2023.

An earlier AML/CFT-related action followed in July 2020. The SC found that Malacca Securities had not responded in time to certain law-enforcement orders under the Anti-Money Laundering Act. It reprimanded the company and directed it to allocate at least RM200,000 to strengthen compliance systems, monitoring, controls and staff training.

Separately, some individuals associated with Malacca Securities have faced disciplinary action for trading-related misconduct. Individual cases must be distinguished from findings against the company and should not automatically be attributed to it.

Overall, Malacca Securities is a locally established, regulated stockbroking firm with access to Bursa Malaysia and Islamic stockbroking services. Its regulatory record also shows past AML/CFT compliance issues. Regulation provides the framework. Transparency provides confidence. Due diligence remains every investor’s responsibility.

Malacca Securities 是马来西亚较成熟的股票经纪公司,也是 Bursa Malaysia Participating Organisation,提供马来西亚股票、网上交易及 Bursa Malaysia-i 的伊斯兰股票经纪服务。

2022 年 9 月,SC 因两项 AML/CFT 指引违规对 Malacca Securities Sdn Bhd 采取行政行动,涉及持续客户尽职调查、账户监控、风险重新分类和可疑交易报告。SC 对每项违规作出谴责,合计罚款 RM220,000;复核申请于 2023 年 2 月被驳回。

阅读完整点评收起

2020 年 7 月另有一项 AML/CFT 行动。SC 指公司未及时回应执法机构根据反洗钱法发出的若干命令,并要求至少拨出 RM200,000 加强合规系统、监控、控制和员工培训。

与公司有关联的个别人士也曾因交易行为受纪律处分,但个人案件必须与针对公司的监管结论分开。

整体而言,它是本地受监管、可接入 Bursa Malaysia 的股票经纪公司,同时也有过去的 AML/CFT 合规纪录。投资者应结合监管、透明度和自身尽职调查作出判断。

Saya telah meneliti Malacca Securities, salah sebuah firma pembrokeran saham yang mapan di Malaysia.

Kedudukannya yang mapan dalam industri pembrokeran saham tempatan ialah satu kekuatan. Ia merupakan Participating Organisation Bursa Malaysia dan menyediakan akses kepada ekuiti Malaysia, dagangan dalam talian serta pembrokeran saham patuh Syariah menerusi Bursa Malaysia-i.

Baca ulasan penuhTunjuk kurang

Pelabur juga perlu memahami sejarah kawal selianya. Pada September 2022, Securities Commission Malaysia (SC) mengambil tindakan pentadbiran terhadap Malacca Securities Sdn Bhd bagi dua pelanggaran Garis Panduan Pencegahan Pengubahan Wang Haram dan Pembiayaan Keganasan (AML/CFT). Isunya termasuk usaha wajar pelanggan dan pemantauan akaun yang berterusan tetapi tidak mencukupi, serta kegagalan berkaitan pengelasan semula risiko dan pelaporan transaksi mencurigakan. SC mengeluarkan teguran bagi setiap pelanggaran dan penalti berjumlah RM220,000. Permohonan semakannya ditolak pada Februari 2023.

Satu lagi tindakan berkaitan AML/CFT berlaku lebih awal, pada Julai 2020. SC mendapati Malacca Securities tidak membalas dalam masa yang ditetapkan terhadap perintah penguatkuasaan undang-undang tertentu di bawah Akta Pencegahan Pengubahan Wang Haram. SC menegurnya dan mengarahkannya memperuntukkan sekurang-kurangnya RM200,000 untuk mengukuhkan sistem pematuhan, pemantauan, kawalan dan latihan kakitangan.

Secara berasingan, beberapa individu yang dikaitkan dengan Malacca Securities pernah menghadapi tindakan tatatertib kerana salah laku berkaitan dagangan. Kes individu mesti dibezakan daripada dapatan terhadap syarikat dan tidak harus dikaitkan dengannya secara automatik.

Secara keseluruhan, Malacca Securities ialah firma pembrokeran saham tempatan yang mapan dan dikawal selia, dengan akses kepada Bursa Malaysia dan perkhidmatan pembrokeran saham Islam. Rekod kawal selianya juga menunjukkan isu pematuhan AML/CFT pada masa lalu. Kawal selia menyediakan rangka kerjanya. Ketelusan memberikan keyakinan. Usaha wajar kekal menjadi tanggungjawab setiap pelabur.

Official sources

Reviews are written by SmartChecker members about their own experience and checked against our review rules. No company can pay to add, change or remove one.

Top mentions

All reviews 619 reviews

  • market_chart_40286

    1 review

    Good Market Data Labels ΓÇö Demo 018

    There is a lot to like about the proposed market data displays structure. More examples involving timestamps and data descriptions would raise the clarity further. It does not describe verified service performance.

  • chart_data_30538

    1 review

    Mixed Funding Guides ΓÇö Demo 024

    This mixed review describes the funding information pages as understandable, though not outstanding. More practical context for deposit and withdrawal instructions would make it easier to evaluate. No actual brokerage usage or transaction is asserted.

  • capital_research_24741

    1 review

    Excellent Privacy Information ΓÇö Demo 080

    The mockup assessment finds the privacy section especially intuitive and well presented. Clear labeling around privacy policies and account data explanations is a highlight of the design concept. This note is for demo interface and sentiment testing only.

  • signal_demo_96694

    1 review

    Mixed Notifications Layout ΓÇö Demo 044

    The alerts settings offers a reasonable starting point in this fictional scenario. A guided walkthrough of notification preferences and labels would improve the overall experience. It does not describe verified service performance.

  • watch_trade_17395

    1 review

    Excellent Onboarding Flow ΓÇö Demo 195

    As a five-star test scenario, the getting started pages has an excellent information hierarchy. The emphasis on steps and account setup information supports a smoother informational experience. This is simulated copy, not a report from a customer.

  • finance_equity_62676

    1 review

    Excellent Notifications Layout ΓÇö Demo 164

    For interface testing, the alerts settings stands out as easy to understand. Clear labeling around notification preferences and labels is a highlight of the design concept. This is simulated copy, not a report from a customer.

  • demo_ms5_049_6743

    1 review

    Mobile Navigation ΓÇö Test Scenario 049

    For a five-star sentiment fixture, small-screen menus and responsive spacing the section headings feel intuitive and well structured. Created solely for testing interface and rating displays.

  • equity_ticker_48613

    1 review

    Mixed Accessibility Options ΓÇö Demo 052

    The accessibility settings looks acceptable as a basic interface concept. The treatment of contrast and keyboard navigation needs clearer language and more examples. It does not describe verified service performance.

  • watch_research_57946

    1 review

    Poor Funding Guides ΓÇö Demo 024

    The fictional user cannot confidently understand the proposed funding information pages. A complete redesign of how deposit and withdrawal instructions is presented should be considered. This is simulated copy, not a report from a customer.

  • invest_trade_19592

    1 review

    Excellent Product Definitions ΓÇö Demo 207

    This synthetic positive review praises the clarity of the product information pages. The emphasis on market instruments and trading risk supports a smoother informational experience. This note is for demo interface and sentiment testing only.

  • market_insight_41830

    1 review

    Good Research Pages ΓÇö Demo 041

    The demo layout of the research section is generally easy to follow. Information about reports and supporting sources is visible, although a few tooltips would improve it. This note is for demo interface and sentiment testing only.

  • demo_analyst_44153

    1 review

    Excellent Fee Disclosure Layout ΓÇö Demo 127

    As a five-star test scenario, the fees page has an excellent information hierarchy. The treatment of cost definitions and comparison examples makes this a strong example of readable financial UI. This note is for demo interface and sentiment testing only.

  • ticker_watch_13878

    1 review

    Excellent Educational Resources ΓÇö Demo 186

    The mockup assessment finds the learning center especially intuitive and well presented. The emphasis on beginner guides and explanations supports a smoother informational experience. It does not describe verified service performance.

  • demo_ms5_094_7184

    1 review

    Order Entry Design ΓÇö Test Scenario 094

    For demo display testing, order form labeling and visual hierarchy the interface concept has strong information hierarchy. This is demo content, not verified customer feedback.

  • demo_ms5_015_7826

    1 review

    Document Center ΓÇö Test Scenario 015

    In this synthetic evaluation, legal document categories and reference links the presentation provides a polished, organized experience. This is demo content, not verified customer feedback.

  • stock_research_89248

    1 review

    Poor Onboarding Flow ΓÇö Demo 015

    This one-star test case flags serious clarity problems in the getting started pages. A complete redesign of how steps and account setup information is presented should be considered. This is simulated copy, not a report from a customer.

  • index_chart_38284

    1 review

    Mixed Mobile Navigation ΓÇö Demo 004

    This mixed review describes the mobile navigation as understandable, though not outstanding. The treatment of small-screen tabs and menus needs clearer language and more examples. It does not describe verified service performance.

  • demo_ms5_036_8014

    1 review

    Price Alerts ΓÇö Test Scenario 036

    As a mock platform review, alert setting labels and interface design the design concept prioritizes readability and logical navigation. No real account, trade, or customer experience is claimed.

  • pulse_stock_57673

    1 review

    Good Onboarding Flow ΓÇö Demo 045

    This example gives the getting started pages a positive but not perfect usability assessment. More examples involving steps and account setup information would raise the clarity further. This is simulated copy, not a report from a customer.

  • demo_ms5_081_1440

    1 review

    Dashboard Organization ΓÇö Test Scenario 081

    In this fictional five-star UI review, dashboard grouping and information hierarchy the section headings feel intuitive and well structured. This is demo content, not verified customer feedback.

Live community reviews (JSON)