Reviews of Malacca Securities Sdn Bhd

This is page 27 of 31 of the reviews SmartChecker holds for Malacca Securities Sdn Bhd. What the public registers say about the company is set out on its record page, not here.

What does SmartChecker make of Malacca Securities?SmartChecker 怎么看 Malacca Securities?Apa pandangan SmartChecker tentang Malacca Securities?

Written by Pang Hui JuanDirector of Online Broker Research

Fact-checked by Ng Kok HeiManaging Malaysian Partner

Fact-checked

I’ve been looking into Malacca Securities, one of Malaysia’s established stockbroking firms.

Its established position in the local stockbroking industry is a strength. It is a Participating Organisation of Bursa Malaysia and provides access to Malaysian equities, online trading and Shariah-compliant stockbroking through Bursa Malaysia-i.

Read the full reviewShow less

Investors should also understand its regulatory history. In September 2022, the Securities Commission Malaysia (SC) took administrative action against Malacca Securities Sdn Bhd for two breaches of its Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing (AML/CFT) Guidelines. The issues included inadequate ongoing customer due diligence and account monitoring, and failures involving risk reclassification and suspicious transaction reporting. The SC issued a reprimand for each breach and a total penalty of RM220,000. Its review application was dismissed in February 2023.

An earlier AML/CFT-related action followed in July 2020. The SC found that Malacca Securities had not responded in time to certain law-enforcement orders under the Anti-Money Laundering Act. It reprimanded the company and directed it to allocate at least RM200,000 to strengthen compliance systems, monitoring, controls and staff training.

Separately, some individuals associated with Malacca Securities have faced disciplinary action for trading-related misconduct. Individual cases must be distinguished from findings against the company and should not automatically be attributed to it.

Overall, Malacca Securities is a locally established, regulated stockbroking firm with access to Bursa Malaysia and Islamic stockbroking services. Its regulatory record also shows past AML/CFT compliance issues. Regulation provides the framework. Transparency provides confidence. Due diligence remains every investor’s responsibility.

Malacca Securities 是马来西亚较成熟的股票经纪公司,也是 Bursa Malaysia Participating Organisation,提供马来西亚股票、网上交易及 Bursa Malaysia-i 的伊斯兰股票经纪服务。

2022 年 9 月,SC 因两项 AML/CFT 指引违规对 Malacca Securities Sdn Bhd 采取行政行动,涉及持续客户尽职调查、账户监控、风险重新分类和可疑交易报告。SC 对每项违规作出谴责,合计罚款 RM220,000;复核申请于 2023 年 2 月被驳回。

阅读完整点评收起

2020 年 7 月另有一项 AML/CFT 行动。SC 指公司未及时回应执法机构根据反洗钱法发出的若干命令,并要求至少拨出 RM200,000 加强合规系统、监控、控制和员工培训。

与公司有关联的个别人士也曾因交易行为受纪律处分,但个人案件必须与针对公司的监管结论分开。

整体而言,它是本地受监管、可接入 Bursa Malaysia 的股票经纪公司,同时也有过去的 AML/CFT 合规纪录。投资者应结合监管、透明度和自身尽职调查作出判断。

Saya telah meneliti Malacca Securities, salah sebuah firma pembrokeran saham yang mapan di Malaysia.

Kedudukannya yang mapan dalam industri pembrokeran saham tempatan ialah satu kekuatan. Ia merupakan Participating Organisation Bursa Malaysia dan menyediakan akses kepada ekuiti Malaysia, dagangan dalam talian serta pembrokeran saham patuh Syariah menerusi Bursa Malaysia-i.

Baca ulasan penuhTunjuk kurang

Pelabur juga perlu memahami sejarah kawal selianya. Pada September 2022, Securities Commission Malaysia (SC) mengambil tindakan pentadbiran terhadap Malacca Securities Sdn Bhd bagi dua pelanggaran Garis Panduan Pencegahan Pengubahan Wang Haram dan Pembiayaan Keganasan (AML/CFT). Isunya termasuk usaha wajar pelanggan dan pemantauan akaun yang berterusan tetapi tidak mencukupi, serta kegagalan berkaitan pengelasan semula risiko dan pelaporan transaksi mencurigakan. SC mengeluarkan teguran bagi setiap pelanggaran dan penalti berjumlah RM220,000. Permohonan semakannya ditolak pada Februari 2023.

Satu lagi tindakan berkaitan AML/CFT berlaku lebih awal, pada Julai 2020. SC mendapati Malacca Securities tidak membalas dalam masa yang ditetapkan terhadap perintah penguatkuasaan undang-undang tertentu di bawah Akta Pencegahan Pengubahan Wang Haram. SC menegurnya dan mengarahkannya memperuntukkan sekurang-kurangnya RM200,000 untuk mengukuhkan sistem pematuhan, pemantauan, kawalan dan latihan kakitangan.

Secara berasingan, beberapa individu yang dikaitkan dengan Malacca Securities pernah menghadapi tindakan tatatertib kerana salah laku berkaitan dagangan. Kes individu mesti dibezakan daripada dapatan terhadap syarikat dan tidak harus dikaitkan dengannya secara automatik.

Secara keseluruhan, Malacca Securities ialah firma pembrokeran saham tempatan yang mapan dan dikawal selia, dengan akses kepada Bursa Malaysia dan perkhidmatan pembrokeran saham Islam. Rekod kawal selianya juga menunjukkan isu pematuhan AML/CFT pada masa lalu. Kawal selia menyediakan rangka kerjanya. Ketelusan memberikan keyakinan. Usaha wajar kekal menjadi tanggungjawab setiap pelabur.

Official sources

Reviews are written by SmartChecker members about their own experience and checked against our review rules. No company can pay to add, change or remove one.

Top mentions

All reviews 619 reviews

  • demo_ms5_084_5625

    1 review

    Market Overview ΓÇö Test Scenario 084

    For demo display testing, market summary panels and quote organization the design concept prioritizes readability and logical navigation. This is demo content, not verified customer feedback.

  • data_invest_98352

    1 review

    Excellent Market Data Labels ΓÇö Demo 108

    As a five-star test scenario, the market data displays has an excellent information hierarchy. The emphasis on timestamps and data descriptions supports a smoother informational experience. This is simulated copy, not a report from a customer.

  • insight_analyst_81414

    1 review

    Excellent Watchlist Organization ΓÇö Demo 151

    As a five-star test scenario, the watchlist has an excellent information hierarchy. The treatment of saved instruments and groups makes this a strong example of readable financial UI. This note is for demo interface and sentiment testing only.

  • trade_pulse_22378

    1 review

    Mixed Content Discoverability ΓÇö Demo 055

    This neutral test assessment finds the website navigation usable but somewhat limited. The treatment of finding key information quickly needs clearer language and more examples. No actual brokerage usage or transaction is asserted.

  • invest_chart_15439

    1 review

    Excellent Analysis Tools Overview ΓÇö Demo 086

    This synthetic positive review praises the clarity of the tools directory. Clear labeling around technical and fundamental research features is a highlight of the design concept. No actual brokerage usage or transaction is asserted.

  • trend_trend_95470

    1 review

    Excellent Security Guidance ΓÇö Demo 028

    This synthetic positive review praises the clarity of the security help pages. The treatment of login protection and account-safety instructions makes this a strong example of readable financial UI. This is simulated copy, not a report from a customer.

  • demo_ms5_120_3127

    1 review

    Learning Navigation ΓÇö Test Scenario 120

    In this fictional user-interface scenario, tutorial grouping and glossary links the section headings feel intuitive and well structured. Created solely for testing interface and rating displays.

  • demo_ms5_111_6729

    1 review

    Help Center ΓÇö Test Scenario 111

    In this fictional five-star UI review, help article categories and support directory the section headings feel intuitive and well structured. No real account, trade, or customer experience is claimed.

  • demo_ms5_104_8525

    1 review

    Market Overview ΓÇö Test Scenario 104

    For demo display testing, market summary panels and quote organization the section headings feel intuitive and well structured. No real account, trade, or customer experience is claimed.

  • watch_market_38440

    1 review

    Needs Improvement Watchlist Organization ΓÇö Demo 001

    The fictional user scenario struggles with the organization of the watchlist. The design should prioritize explanations of saved instruments and groups instead of relying on assumptions. No actual brokerage usage or transaction is asserted.

  • demo_ms5_019_7226

    1 review

    Accessibility Design ΓÇö Test Scenario 019

    For a five-star sentiment fixture, text contrast and navigational clarity the information is thoughtfully grouped and visually balanced. This is demo content, not verified customer feedback.

  • folio_finance_13541

    1 review

    Excellent Risk Disclosures ΓÇö Demo 128

    The mockup assessment finds the risk information especially intuitive and well presented. Clear labeling around warnings and product-specific explanations is a highlight of the design concept. This note is for demo interface and sentiment testing only.

  • invest_signal_52977

    1 review

    Excellent Support Navigation ΓÇö Demo 070

    The mockup assessment finds the help center especially intuitive and well presented. The treatment of contact routes and FAQ topics makes this a strong example of readable financial UI. No actual brokerage usage or transaction is asserted.

  • invest_finance_88611

    1 review

    Excellent Language Clarity ΓÇö Demo 047

    This synthetic positive review praises the clarity of the interface copy. Clear labeling around terminology and short explanations is a highlight of the design concept. This note is for demo interface and sentiment testing only.

  • demo_ms5_100_3804

    1 review

    Learning Navigation ΓÇö Test Scenario 100

    In this fictional user-interface scenario, tutorial grouping and glossary links the design concept prioritizes readability and logical navigation. No real account, trade, or customer experience is claimed.

  • equity_chart_55626

    1 review

    Excellent Account Comparison ΓÇö Demo 069

    As a five-star test scenario, the account information has an excellent information hierarchy. The emphasis on account options and eligibility supports a smoother informational experience. No actual brokerage usage or transaction is asserted.

  • finance_equity_89841

    1 review

    Mixed Search And Filtering ΓÇö Demo 035

    This neutral test assessment finds the instrument search usable but somewhat limited. A guided walkthrough of filters and results would improve the overall experience. It does not describe verified service performance.

  • finance_folio_85360

    1 review

    Mixed Responsive Spacing ΓÇö Demo 019

    This mixed review describes the mobile page layout as understandable, though not outstanding. The treatment of readability and touch target sizes needs clearer language and more examples. It does not describe verified service performance.

  • pulse_demo_28247

    1 review

    Needs Improvement Educational Resources ΓÇö Demo 006

    The fictional user scenario struggles with the organization of the learning center. Additional safeguards and simpler descriptions of beginner guides and explanations are needed. This is simulated copy, not a report from a customer.

  • equity_capital_51460

    1 review

    Poor Responsive Spacing ΓÇö Demo 019

    The fictional user cannot confidently understand the proposed mobile page layout. The scenario requires clear, prominent explanations of readability and touch target sizes before it is usable. This note is for demo interface and sentiment testing only.

Live community reviews (JSON)